my mom’s argument against piracy is “well what if you wrote a book and one person bought it and then hundreds of people got to read it for free and you didn’t make any money!”
MOTHER YOU HAVE JUST DESCRIBED
LIBRARIES
Libraries: the original file-sharing program.
…Which also are under attack, or at least are the first to get funding cut, even before schools.
This.
You want some digital rights scary from the library world? EBOOKS.
Right now, a library can buy a print book from anywhere for the same price as your average guy on the street and its theirs to circulate until it gets stolen, destroyed, or removed from the collection.
eBooks?
1) A lot of publishers sell eBooks to libraries for more than they charge average consumers. That 9.99 bestseller? Could cost your library $20. (Right now, most libraries get discounts for buying print books.)
2) One publisher - HarperCollins - has instituted a 26-use limit on their eBooks. After 26 checkouts - poof! The books just disappears. Got 27 people on the list for that bestseller? Better pony up for another copy.
3) Two of the biggest publishers - Simon and Schuster and Macmillan - will not sell eBooks to libraries AT ALL. Why, hello, censorship!
4) eBooks for libraries are managed by outside vendors who require yearly service payments. If a library loses its print books funding, sure, there are no new books, but you’ve still got all the old books on the shelf. If you accumulate an eBook collection of 10,000 volumes but lose funding ONE YEAR and cannot pay the bill, your entire collection vanishes, just like that.
Publishers have never liked libraries, despite all evidence pointing to libraries helping, rather than hurting, publishers. (Almost every book I own, I own because I read that author at a library first.)
So, yeah, enjoy libraries while you’ve got ‘em. Funding problems are scary, but this kind of digital censorship is way, way scarier.















